In many cases, discrepancies can already be resolved through a clarifying conversation, for example if certain value-relevant facts were not known to us.
If there are fundamental professional doubts, a second, independent valuer can be commissioned to review or recreate the appraisal report.
In court proceedings, if there are significant discrepancies between two appraisal reports, the court can additionally order a neutral superior expert opinion to conclusively resolve the disputed issue.
It is important to raise concrete professional objections rather than mere gut feeling – for example, based on differing, genuinely comparable sales cases in the immediate vicinity.
A well-founded, objective counter-proposal makes it considerably easier for us, as the original valuer, to comprehensibly review or adjust our assessment.