This article is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or financial advice, nor a valuation in an individual case. Despite careful research, we assume no liability for accuracy, completeness, and timeliness. For specific questions, please consult a lawyer or tax advisor. Older content may be outdated due to changes in legislation or case law.
Claims for damages against us can only be considered at all if the client is able to prove that an appraisal report was actually prepared with gross errors and that this caused them a concrete, quantifiable financial loss.
Professional margins of discretion in valuation, such as the selection of comparable properties or the weighting of property-specific characteristics, do not in themselves establish liability, as long as they are objectively justifiable.
For court-appointed valuers, special liability rules also apply, limiting liability to grossly negligent or intentional conduct. An existing professional liability insurance policy also protects both parties in the rare event of a claim.
In practice, this means that two professionally justifiable but differing assessments of the same valuer on peripheral issues do not, in themselves, give rise to a claim for damages.
Only when it can be demonstrably shown that recognized valuation principles were grossly disregarded, for example through clearly unsuitable comparable properties or calculation errors, can liability be seriously considered.